The Expensive G.P. Anticlimax
Brian Steel (and informants) 28 July 2002
For the whole period of the Seva Conference (the promised pro-SB
Public Relations statement is eagerly awaited, but maybe we should not hold our
breath!), SB was under the influence of a noticeable physical disability: the
massive abscess - or mumps? - swelling visible in the official photos (see in
this page 'Developments':
SEVA CONFERENCE AND GURU PURNIMA 2002
). Typically,
but still slightly incredibly, even to hard-bitten SB-watchers,
this physical and officially documented fact is already being DENIED by some
diehard, rhinoceros-hided, devotees!
SB's darshan performances were brief, and presumably very painful. His
Discourses were briefer than usual and not very relevant to this important and
highly orchestrated (damage control) Seva Conference. And, as if under strict
orders from his "own" SSO, SB made not a single reference to his alleged
Divinity - except, perhaps, with reference to the "assumed"
illness. (His personal stoicism to the obvious pain and discomfort was,
nevertheless, highly commendable. Admirable! Get well soon, SB!)
In his Discourse on G.P. Day (24 July), SB had the "cheek" (whoops!) to say that
the swelling had gone down because adoring devotees had prayed for it the day
before. But surely, after 10 DAYS, such an outcome was medically predictable -
INEVITABLE. The hideous swelling just had to go down! And it certainly does not
take Omniscience to know that those many thousands of adoring (and gullible)
devotees present at Prasanthi would be praying fervently for the rapid recovery
of their beloved "divine" guru.
After once more registering one's natural sympathy for a fellow human being's
pain, on a more objective level, the following observations may be made of this
latter half of the G.P. Festival:
In all the Guru Purnima discourses, it was significant that not ONE mention of
Divinity was made by SB - as if kowtowing to "official" orders not to do so!
Other observations on these briefer than usual G.P. Discourses (as relayed by
the increasingly sophisticated and powerful websites now administered by the SSO
- in spite of the emotionally stated 1999 "veto" of such means of communication
by SB):
The translated and edited Discourse of 23 July 2002:
"Today, the members of Sri Sathya Sai Organisation are undertaking several types
of sadhana. But, are they real sadhanas or illusory? No, no; they are not real
sadhanas. They appear to be real for some time and later on they are given up.
You start doing japa as a sadhana and continue it for some time. Later on, you
give up japa and enter into dhyana. Even this dhyana is
only till you achieve your object of dhyana. When once it is achieved, it loses
its purpose. Thus, all the sadhanas you undertake are only temporary ."
.
"Embodiments of Love!
Knowingly or unknowingly you are doing sadhana based on what you think to be
correct. If you desire to know what is dhyana in the real sense, ask Me. I will
explain to you. In fact, you do not need any sadhana. Do as I say; you will get
the result in a moment. Divinity is that which manifests right in front of you
out of His grace. It cannot be obtained with the help of rigorous practices.
Everybody is doing sadhana attaching himself to certain forms. In the process,
he is trying to establish the glory of his own form. This is not correct. You
should forget your own form and lose your consciousness in divinity. What is the
use of doing dhyana, all the while concentrating upon one's own form? When
somebody enquires what you are
doing, you reply that you are doing dhyana. How do you know that you are doing
dhyana when in fact your body consciousness itself is lost in dhyana? That
means, you are not doing real dhyana. Dhyana is that, in which you forget your
own self; you develop purity of conscience and establish the eternity of your
Atma Thatthwa. Without achieving this, dhyana is a waste and real cheating."
.
"Embodiments of Love!
I presume you have never undertaken such a great sadhana so far. Do not bother;
we will look into it later. First and foremost, begin your contemplation on
divinity with pure love. Only then will you gain spiritual strength."
Guru Purnima Discourse 24 July 2002:
A rather lacklustre event:
"Devotees offer their prayers to God. Some people doubt the efficacy of prayer.
But, in fact any mighty task can be accomplished through prayer. It makes
impossible things possible. Here is a small example. There has been a swelling
on My cheek for the past ten days. I never take any medicine. Yesterday I
observed that the attention of all those assembled here was
focused on My cheek, not on Me! They were worried that the swelling had still
not reduced and that Swami was undergoing a lot of pain. After I delivered the
Valedictory Discourse, I retired to My room. As I was resting, a number of
devotees were praying to Me that I should cure Myself at least by the auspicious
day of Guru Purnima. All their prayers reached Me. When I
got up in the morning, the swelling reduced and there was absolutely no pain
whatsoever. In fact, I had not willed that it should be so. It is the result of
the prayers of devotees. Yesterday, many did not even take food. With tears in
their eyes, they were praying continuously. My thoughts went to them for a
moment. But I never willed that I should be cured. I never do it. Why? As Sanjay
Sahni rightly pointed out, "I and you are one." You are not different from Me.
This is not My body, it is yours. So, it is your responsibility to take care of
this body. I never think of My body and its well-being. I never make a Sankalpa
(Will) that such and such a thing should happen, so far as My body is concerned.
There is no selfishness in Me from head to toe. That is why I have got every
right to declare that I and you are one."
***
Conclusion:
This is obviously nowhere near a Jonestown situation and never will be, thank
(the real) God. However, there ARE serious cult characteristics in the behaviour
of the guru and the SSO, and that of well-meaning but gullible devotees, as well
as the much more deliberate defence propaganda by unofficial devotee groups and
fanatical devotees.
(To be continued - if necessary.)